Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Support #950

open

IP8 interviewer numbers

Added by Jonathan Burton over 6 years ago. Updated over 6 years ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
-
Start date:
04/05/2018
% Done:

100%

Description

Hi,

I am raising this on behalf of Dana Garbarski who contacted me directly -

It's a follow up on issue 745 - https://iserswww.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/745 - and relates to the interviewer numbers at IP8. The issue 745 was closed with the note that "This will be addressed for the release of IP9 data." However, it looks like this was not done.

Dana's email:
I just got around to downloading the data for wave 9, and it looks like the issue with the interviewer numbers is not resolved—the interviewer id is in the xivdata does not match the interviewer id when I try to merge with household data in wave 8 (h_hhsamp_ip), although it will work with households in waves 7 and 9). So it looks like the interviewer ids in wave 8 household data have been misnamed with this release. Let me know if I’m missing something or if there is another release planned when you have a chance.

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Jonathan Burton over 6 years ago

You should be able to fix it by subtracting 21000000 from positive numbers if they are above 42000000. This will bring it into the correct range. The corrected version will be released with IP10 data this summer.

Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Jonathan Burton over 6 years ago

i_intnum in i_indresp_ip is not correct at all – this will be addressed at IP10 release

Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Stephanie Auty over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Feedback
  • % Done changed from 0 to 80
  • Private changed from Yes to No
Actions
Copy link
 #4

Updated by Dana Garbarski over 6 years ago

Jonathan Burton wrote:

You should be able to fix it by subtracting 21000000 from positive numbers if they are above 42000000. This will bring it into the correct range. The corrected version will be released with IP10 data this summer.

Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Dana Garbarski over 6 years ago

Unfortunately, subtracting 21000000 from all eligible (not missing, -9/-1) h_intnum in the wave 8 household data from this release does not seem to address the issue completely. This only leads to 580 household matches using the wave 8 household data from this release, compared to 1,192 using the wave 8 household data from the prior release (and xivdata from this release). This is pasted below. For now I will continue to use the wave 8 household data from the prior release. Let me know if you need more information from me. Thanks for following up so quickly on this! -Dana

. tab _merge

_merge |      Freq.     Percent        Cum.
------------------------+-----------------------------------
        master only (1) |      1,158       13.45       13.45
         using only (2) |      6,874       79.82       93.27
            matched (3) |        580        6.73      100.00
------------------------+-----------------------------------
                  Total |      8,612      100.00
. tab _merge
_merge |      Freq.     Percent        Cum.
 ------------------------+-----------------------------------
         master only (1) |        546        6.38        6.38
          using only (2) |      6,817       79.68       86.07
             matched (3) |      1,192       13.93      100.00
 ------------------------+-----------------------------------
                   Total |      8,555      100.00
Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Stephanie Auty over 6 years ago

  • Status changed from Feedback to Resolved
  • % Done changed from 80 to 100

This issue was resolved in the IP10 data release.

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF