Support #469
closed
cross tabulation question
Added by Veronique Siegler about 9 years ago.
Updated almost 9 years ago.
Description
When I cross tabulate c_jbnnssec_dv (NS-SEC of current job) with c_jobstat (current employment status) , some people who are in paid employment or self-employed according to c_jobstat do not have an NS-SEC and are classified as missing or inapplicable for c_jobnnsec_dv. I am wondering why that is?
- Status changed from New to In Progress
- Assignee changed from Alita Nandi to Veronique Siegler
- Target version set to X M
- % Done changed from 0 to 50
Hi Veronique,
when you look at the online variable level description you will see that _jbnssec_dv is derived from _jbsoc00 and _jbes2000; if any of these were missing, _jbnssec_dv could not be derived. In the variable notes to _jbsoc00 and also in the questionnaire you can also see that this question was applicable only to those who had _jbhas or _jboff==1. By comparing the question behind _jbstat and _jbhas you can work out where discrepancies might stem from. E.g. somebody might say being a student best describes their current employment status, yet they may have been in paid employment in the last four weeks, and vice versa. If there are discrepancies that are not explained by the fact that _jbstat is not used in the routing for _jbnssec_dv, please let us know and we can investigate. Note that it may take longer to receive a response over the holiday season.
Hope this helps!
- Status changed from In Progress to Resolved
- % Done changed from 50 to 100
- Status changed from Resolved to Closed
Also available in: Atom
PDF
Updated by Gundi Knies 
Updated by Victoria Nolan