Actions
Support #244
closedGHQ-12 measures in wave 3
Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
-
Category:
Data documentation
Start date:
02/22/2014
% Done:
100%
Description
Hi,
I'm not entirely sure whether I have interpreted this right, but it looks as if the scale for c_scghqk is incorrectly inversed. Higher response values across the GHQ-12 components denote a poorer overall score except for this variable where a lower score actually means a worse score. Do you know how this question might have been interpreted by respondents? Could it just be an error in the value labelling?
Thanks
Updated by Redmine Admin over 11 years ago
- Category set to Data documentation
- Target version set to X M
- % Done changed from 0 to 90
Updated by Redmine Admin over 11 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- % Done changed from 90 to 100
Actions