Understanding Society User Support: Issueshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/support/favicon.ico?15995719382018-08-20T21:15:06ZUnderstanding Society User Support
Redmine Support #1022 (Resolved): Longitudinal weighthttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/10222018-08-20T21:15:06ZCamille Portier
<p>Dear Understanding Society Team,</p>
<p>I am looking at change in health status if individuals accross wave 2 to wave 5. My variable of interest comes from the longitudinal self-completion questionaire therefore I believe the right weight to use for my fixed-effect models is indscus_lw. However, when I want to run my fixed effect model with this pweight, stata tells me that the weight must be constant within pidp. To which values should I therefore set my weight to? What does a indscus_lw=0 mean?</p>
<p>Thank you for your help,</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />Camille</p> Support #989 (Resolved): Initial Outcomes for Innovation Panel Wave 1 Before Re-issuing https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/9892018-06-27T12:28:24ZEliud Kibuchi
<p>We are doing some research on the effect of interviewers on the effectiveness of incentives, one of the data sets we are using is the Innovation Panel (Wave 1). It is the sample file which shows the fieldwork outcome for each issued address and has the interviewer ID attached. We have come across a potential problem with your analysis which relates to whether the outcome data is based on the initial (prior to re-issues) or final (after re-issues) outcomes. We think it is the initial outcome but cannot tell from the information provided. Because our analysis uses the experimental design of within-interviewer allocation of the incentive, it is important that our analysis is based on the initial rather than the final outcomes.</p>
<p>I wonder whether a data set with the initial outcome codes is available for Innovation Panel wave 1 and how we can obtain it?</p>
<p>Many thanks, <br />EK</p> Support #848 (Closed): Clinical Depression H_COND variableshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/8482017-09-04T15:55:51ZLuca Bernardiluca.bernardi@uab.cat
<p>Dear Support group,</p>
<p>I am measuring clinical depression and I would kindly need your advice on a couple of questions. I apologise sincerely for putting immediate priority on this, but your answer might also have implications for a paper I am co-authoring within the Understanding Society EU Referendum project and we have a deadline shortly for submitting the paper.</p>
<p>As I am interested in objective depression, I was using the questions H_COND17 and H_CONDS17 to create a measure of depression. What I was doing is to assign value 1 to respondents who replied that they still have depression in H_CONDS17=Yes (as I am interested in the effects of depression, I do not care much if the person was diagnosed with depression at some point in his/her life - i.e. H_COND17=Yes - but rather it is important that the person is depressed at the time of the interview). I assign value 0 if the respondent mentioned that he/she has never been diagnosed with depression in H_COND17=No.</p>
<p>So far I was using data from waves 1, and 3 to 6 as I noticed that these two variables are available in all waves but wave 2 (<a class="external" href="https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/mainstage/dataset-documentation/wave/2/datafile/b_indresp">https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/mainstage/dataset-documentation/wave/2/datafile/b_indresp</a>), where instead a slightly different question is asked: H_CONDN17. In turn, this question is not available in all waves and sometimes is asked together with the previous two questions (e.g., <a class="external" href="https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/mainstage/dataset-documentation/wave/4/datafile/d_indresp">https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/mainstage/dataset-documentation/wave/4/datafile/d_indresp</a>).</p>
<p>My questions thus are the following. Do you please know what is the reason of such a variation and, more importantly, can I "maximise" my number of depressives by creating a measure of depression that combines both sets of questions (i.e., H_COND17 and H_CONDS17, and H_CONDN17) and makes use of all available waves (i.e. 1 to 6)?</p>
<p>My idea was to do the following:</p>
<p>gen depression = .</p>
<p>replace depression = 1 if hconds17==1 | hcondn17==1</p>
<p>replace depression = 0 if hcond17==0 | hcondn17==0</p>
<p>However, I wonder how problematic can be mixing questions that are not available in all waves, as this is certainly a point that reviewers will raise. I would really appreciate your thoughts on this.</p>
<p>Many thanks and best wishes,<br />Luca</p> Support #515 (Closed): Matching pid across waves https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/5152016-03-02T20:04:50ZChristopher Boothchristopher.booth@durham.ac.uk
<p>I have merged whhresp and windresp files using a m:1 match as you mentioned before. However, when matching pid between waves J and O I have found that only 1500 individuals are included in both waves. I am under the impression that this should not be the case as all individuals in the sample are followed for every wave? So should all individuals interviewed in wave J also have been interviewed in wave O? Please could you let me know if this is the case and possibly what could have led me to only finding 1500 persons with the same pids across waves J and O.</p>
<p>Thank you</p> Support #514 (Closed): BHPS wave O proxy and or phone datahttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/5142016-02-29T19:25:32ZChristopher Boothchristopher.booth@durham.ac.uk
<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I am looking at wave O, specifically files ohhresp and oindresp. However, for variables osvack, onvestk, oxpmeal, oxpleis almost all of the results are 'proxy and or phone'.I am looking to run cross-sectional analysis using waves J and O, but it seems I may not be able to do this because of the missing data. Does this mean that there is no data for these variables in wave O, or is there another way of finding the data for these variables?</p>
<p>Many thanks</p> Support #508 (Closed): BHPS identifying households or individuals across waves https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/5082016-02-21T10:46:34ZChristopher Boothchristopher.booth@durham.ac.uk
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I am looking to analyse a number of variables such as income, wealth and consumption across waves and to see how they change. From what I understand I cannot link households across waves. But to link individuals across waves I have to use the person identifier (PID). I am specifically looking at the data files whhresp and windresp from waves J-R. Within these I can find the variable for household identification number but I cannot find the variable for PID. Please could you help identify where I can find PID so that I can analyse this data for individuals across waves.</p>
<p>Thanks</p> Support #479 (Closed): Urgent - data accesss support https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/4792016-01-06T05:31:37ZChristopher Boothchristopher.booth@durham.ac.uk
<p>I am looking to download data in a format that I can ideally use in excel. If not, I am willing to download any software which will help me access the data. I am confused by the number of different data files available to download and am unsure which is best for me.</p>
<p>After downloading the British Household Panel Survey: Waves 1-18, 1991-2009 data file in tab format I have opened it in excel. However, it is in a format which seems impossible for me to understand.</p>
<p>I would be very grateful if you could provide exact instructions on what file I should download to access the variables I require as follows:</p>
<p>From at least 3 waves or more:</p>
<p>Household makeup / structure / type <br />Household income <br />Household wealth <br />Household financial assets <br />Household housing/property assets</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Chris</p> Support #465 (Closed): Immediate - BHPS data access help https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/4652015-12-14T16:33:05ZChristopher Boothchristopher.booth@durham.ac.uk
<p>Dear Understanding Society User Support,</p>
<p>I have registered for the UK Data Service and acquired BHPS data for my dissertation. However, I have found it difficult to find data on household’s wealth, financial and housing assets and consumption. Looking at the summary table I noticed that waves 5,10 and 15 include information on wealth, assets and debt.</p>
<p>I would be very grateful if you would be able to help me find and access information on the following variables or others of a similar nature from at least 3 waves or more:</p>
<p>Household makeup / structure / type <br />Household income <br />Household wealth <br />Household financial assets <br />Household housing/property assets</p> Support #411 (Closed): Ethnicity and Socio-economic informationhttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/4112015-09-08T15:30:49ZJaviera Cartagena Fariasjaviera.cartagena-farias@natcen.ac.uk
<p>We are looking at the possibility of using Understanding Society to compare pupils outcomes (intervention v/s comparison groups). We would like to make sure we could request information related to: pupils attainment, Unique Pupil Number (UPN), ethnicity and socio-economic information providing we have a opt-out consent letter from every pupil.<br />Thank you very much in advance</p> Support #390 (Closed): how to deal with inapplicable valueshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/3902015-07-20T14:42:58ZJun LiuJun.Liu@warwcik.ac.uk
<p>Dear support team<br /> a lot of the variables in the Understanding Society dataset has a high percentage of inapplicable values. For example, the highest qualification variable, w_qfhigh, has around 85-90% of inapplicable values. How should I deal with the inapplicable values? Is inapplicable values the same as missing values? why is a variable like the highest qualification has so many inapplicable values? I would assume most of the people in the sample has some kind of education. Any other inputs on the questions will be much appreciated.</p>
<pre><code>Thank you </code></pre>
<pre><code>Jun</code></pre> Support #284 (Closed): Ethnic Boost in Innovation Panelhttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/2842014-07-10T08:11:24ZHSIN CHENhsinchen.sylvana@gmail.com
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Are there boost samples for ethnic in Innovation panel? Since I cannot find the information about it, thank you.<br />Besides, I've checked a_psnenip_xd (cross-sectional person design weight), the value ranged from 1 to 4. However, the frequency table on the website is only 1, I would like to know what make them different, thank you. And since the Innovation Panel sample is a equal probability design, why there are different design weights for individuals. Thank you.</p>
<p><a class="external" href="https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/innovation-panel/dataset-documentation/wave/1/datafile/a_indresp_ip/variable/a_psnenip_xd">https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/innovation-panel/dataset-documentation/wave/1/datafile/a_indresp_ip/variable/a_psnenip_xd</a></p> Support #281 (Closed): Weights for IP5https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/2812014-07-04T12:20:09ZHSIN CHENhsinchen.sylvana@gmail.com
<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Thanks for previous answers.</p>
<p>However,I still have a problem on design weight for both original sample and refreshment sample.According to previous feedback, it is stated "Essentially, considering the longitudinal structure of the data and recognizing that attrition occurs between waves 1 and 4, we do not provide separate design weight. But if it helps, IP (both original and refreshment) have almost an equal probability sample designs."</p>
<p>In the IP1 data set, the variable "a_psnenip_xd" shows that the design weight is from 1 to 4. So for refreshment sample in IP4, should I use 1 as design weight or other amount(from 1 to 4)? Thank you so much.</p> Support #277 (Closed): Wave 2 Results from Methodological Experimentshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/2772014-06-30T18:20:03ZHsin Chen
<p>When I was reading "Understanding Society Innovation Panel Wave 2 Results from Methodological Experiments" I tried to compare the the response in the report with the data set. I have a question about the data. According to the paper, the total sample size for the experiment on interview mode is 2,100. However, I tried to run the data set and filtered out samples who are less than 16, the total sample size was 2,148. I know there were 37 allocation errors happened during interviewing, however, there were still 11 samples not shown in the table. I would like to know whether I missed to filter unqualified sample, if so, what type of sample was been removed, thanks.</p> Support #272 (Closed): Questions about IP1 and IP4.https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/2722014-06-20T07:16:03ZHsin Chen
<p>Dear Sir or Madam,</p>
<p>My name is Hsin, a postgraduate student in the Univeirsty of Manchester. I used Innovation Panel as my data set for my dissertation, and I have fronted some problems.</p>
<p>One is the missing data. Due to my topic, I need to merge data (1) IP1 and IP2 individual (2) IP4 and IP5 individuals. However, after I proceed the merging, there are 1031 and 637 missing respectively. I also tried to merge only (1) IP1 "full productive interview" individual and IP2 all individual (2) IP4 "full productive interview" and IP5 all indivudals, still, there are 600 and 329 missing relatively. I could not understand the reason why cross wave personal id of respondents in IP1 or IP4 doesn't exist in IP2 or IP5.</p>
<p>Another issue is about "design weight". I could not find the design weight for IP4 refreshment sample.</p>
<p>Thank you for your kindly help.</p> Support #127 (Closed): variables used to construct survey weightshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1272013-02-28T23:58:06ZLaura Kudrna
<p>Hello,</p>
<p>Where can I find out which variables were used to construct the survey weights available for Wave 2 of US?</p>
<p>This will be essential information for persuading my colleagues to use them on an imminent analysis.</p>
<p>Many thanks.</p>
<p>Kind regards,<br />Laura</p>