Activity
From 03/29/2015 to 04/27/2015
04/27/2015
- 05:53 PM Support #363: educational qualification variables
- Dear Yaojun,
the variable QFHIGH_DV does not consider as many qualifications as HIQUAL_DV. You can see this when you... - 04:55 PM Support #363 (Closed): educational qualification variables
- Dear Sir/Madam,
Could you please advise me whether w_hiqual or w_qfhigh is a better (more accurate) indicator of t... - 04:06 PM Support #362: weights for longitudinal analysis
- ANS to Q1 ("To first study the inequalities...."): Yes, if you are using information that are available for full and ...
- 02:38 PM Support #362 (Closed): weights for longitudinal analysis
- Dear Alita Nandi,
I am postgraduate student aat the University of Lund. I am working on my final dissertation and ...
04/26/2015
- 10:43 AM Support #361 (Closed): variables about house's type
- Hi,
I am Maria, a PhD student in Sociology. I am using the Wave 3 of UKHLS. I checked in the indresp and hhresp dat...
04/23/2015
04/21/2015
- 03:09 PM Support #359: savings greater than income
- forwarded to the BHPS team.
- 09:22 AM Support #359 (Closed): savings greater than income
- Dear all,
working on the BHPS I noticed that there is a lot of observation which show annual saving (amount saved ... - 02:02 PM Support #357: cluster variable
- Response to #5
If you are using 40+ year olds of all the 4 samples taken together then use wLRWTUK1. If the last w... - 12:11 PM Support #360: Non-response models for Wave 2
- And yes, we used Lavallee's method.
- 12:10 PM Support #360: Non-response models for Wave 2
- 1. These are the variables in the model for households with more than one eligible person (for single-person househol...
- 11:34 AM Support #360: Non-response models for Wave 2
- Hello,
I also have one further question related to the construction of Wave 2 cross sectional weights. Can you pr... - 10:13 AM Support #360 (Closed): Non-response models for Wave 2
- Hello,
On page 63 of the User Manual, it says that non-response to Wave 2 (for the construction of individual cro... - 11:00 AM Support #356: Longitudinal response rates
- Dear Dharmi,
We have not yet produced and published standardised longitudinal response rates of the kind that you ...
04/16/2015
- 01:12 PM Support #357: cluster variable
- In addition, my variable of interest is "save": sometimes the variable takes value -7 since this specific obs was a ...
- 10:22 AM Support #357: cluster variable
- Dear Alita,
I am using the entire sample (with all the boosting) and I guess I will consider a subsample (age 40+)...
04/15/2015
- 11:20 AM Support #357: cluster variable
- If in the documentation it has been specified that a specific weight is for the Original "Essex" Sample - it means yo...
04/14/2015
- 08:45 AM Support #357: cluster variable
- Dear Alita,
Thank you for your answer.
It is not totally clear to me how this procedure of weighting using lo...
04/13/2015
- 10:58 AM Support #358 (In Progress): selfemployed well being
- > Have you done any analyses of those who are self-employed, that I can look at? Based on the recent ONS analysis of ...
- 10:33 AM Support #358 (Closed): selfemployed well being
- I contacted ONS on 25th March following its recently published report on wellbeing measures and job status but was ad...
- 10:50 AM Support #357: cluster variable
- Most statistical packages assume that the data is a simple random sample. But if it is not, as in the case of the BHP...
- 09:06 AM Support #357 (In Progress): cluster variable
- The weights are needed for the point estimates, while the PSU and strata are needed for the confidence intervals. Mor...
- 10:50 AM Support #351 (Closed): longitudinal vs. cross-sectional weights
- 10:47 AM Support #351: longitudinal vs. cross-sectional weights
- Thanks a lot, much clearer now!
- 10:43 AM Support #351: longitudinal vs. cross-sectional weights
- 1. Yes. Using c_indinub_lw means that the sample statistics can be used as the population estimates for those who are...
- 10:32 AM Support #352: BHPS
- 1. In the BHPS respondents are eligible for interview even if they have not responded in one wave. As a result differ...
- 09:08 AM Support #352 (Closed): BHPS
- 09:10 AM Support #354 (Closed): mc
- 09:09 AM Support #353 (Closed): fed-forward (_ff_): what does this mean (doesn't always match previous wave)
- 09:06 AM Support #347 (Closed): finding open-ended question data from BHPS
04/11/2015
- 02:49 PM Support #357 (Closed): cluster variable
- I am working on the BHPS dataset. My aim is to check whether the change in the Long Term Care policies in 2002 had an...
04/10/2015
- 09:35 AM Support #356 (Closed): Longitudinal response rates
- Hello,
I wanted to know if unconditional longitudinal individual response rates have been calculated for Wave 2 o...
04/02/2015
- 05:19 PM Support #332 (Closed): In ECHP, FC and WFTC are included in pi211mg and deducted to get pi211m?
- 02:48 PM Support #158 (Closed): Derived income variables in the BHPS
- We are planning a BHPS revision later this year and will redress the issue then. On behalf of the team, Jakob
- 02:48 PM Support #243 (Closed): BHPS query - Waves 12 + 17
- We are planning a BHPS revision later this year and will redress the issue then. On behalf of the team, Jakob
- 02:46 PM Support #343 (Closed): Variables jnmnth and jnyear missing in wave 4?
- The way data on household joiners were asked changed slightly between W3 and 4 and the variable names were changed. U...
- 02:43 PM Support #344 (Closed): Where can I find the variables movemth and moveyr in waves 2, 3 and 4?
- movemth and moveyr are asked about issued sample members in responding households and they are now scheduled for rele...
04/01/2015
- 03:21 PM Support #332: In ECHP, FC and WFTC are included in pi211mg and deducted to get pi211m?
- > I tend to think that this is not the case
Unfortunately, it has not been possible to verify this - although your... - 03:18 PM Support #347 (In Progress): finding open-ended question data from BHPS
- I can confirm that the verbatim data have not been prepared for neither safeguarded nor controlled release. It could ...
03/30/2015
- 08:30 AM Support #351: longitudinal vs. cross-sectional weights
- Hi Jacob,
Thanks again for your response. I was re-reading your previous answer and I wanted to double-check.
1...
Also available in: Atom