https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/support/favicon.ico?15995719382016-11-03T15:02:02ZUnderstanding Society User SupportUnderstanding Society User Support - Support #650: anwstathttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/650?journal_id=22152016-11-03T15:02:02ZVictoria Nolanvlnolan@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Alita Nandi</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>10</i></li><li><strong>Private</strong> changed from <i>Yes</i> to <i>No</i></li></ul><p>Many thanks for your enquiry - we are looking into it and will get back to you as soon as we can.</p>
<p>Best wishes, <br />The Understanding Society Data User Support Team</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #650: anwstathttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/650?journal_id=22172016-11-03T18:34:26ZAlita Nandi
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>Alita Nandi</i> to <i>Sait Bayrakdar</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>10</i> to <i>90</i></li></ul><p>If the whole household drops out of the survey and so we do not know whether they are still living together then because the EGO will not be in an interviewed household in the next wave their code will be "3 in non-interviewed HH". In this case if you match EGO and ALTER's next wave status both should be 3.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />The Understanding Society Data User Support Team</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #650: anwstathttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/650?journal_id=22262016-11-14T09:21:49ZSait Bayrakdarsb2152@cam.ac.uk
<ul></ul><p>Thank you very much for your reply.</p>
<p>Just to be on the safe side then, I would like to ask whether this statement in the data documentation is not completely correct for all cases: <br />"Alter’s residence at next wave. Indicates whether a pair of current co-resident household members (the Ego and the Alter) continue to be co-resident in the next wave of interview. <strong>For those who are not co-resident in the next wave, the indicator differentiates between whether the alter is in a different household, the alter is part of a non-responding household, the alter is part of household that was not fielded or the alter has died</strong>."</p>
<p>My understanding is that if the alter is part of a non-responding household, then they are not necessarily non-co-resident with the ego in the next wave. And I can differentiate these two, by checking if ego and alter have both on of the following: a)part of a non-responding household or b) part of a household that was not fielded. Is that correct?</p>
<p>Many thanks!</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #650: anwstathttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/650?journal_id=22292016-11-22T13:03:50ZVictoria Nolanvlnolan@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>Sait Bayrakdar</i> to <i>Alita Nandi</i></li></ul> Understanding Society User Support - Support #650: anwstathttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/650?journal_id=23442017-01-11T11:45:58ZAlita Nandi
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> changed from <i>Alita Nandi</i> to <i>Sait Bayrakdar</i></li></ul><p>If the Ego is in a responding household next wave but the alter is not, then they are necessarily in different households. But if both are in non-responding households next wave then they may or may not be in the same household.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />Alita</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #650: anwstathttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/650?journal_id=23712017-01-19T13:14:26ZVictoria Nolanvlnolan@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>90</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul>