https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/support/favicon.ico?15995719382021-01-18T08:39:03ZUnderstanding Society User SupportUnderstanding Society User Support - Support #1483: The use of weight "indscui_lw" reduces the number of observations. Is it correct?https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1483?journal_id=56432021-01-18T08:39:03ZAlita Nandi
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Olena Kaminska</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>10</i></li></ul><p>Many thanks for your enquiry. The Understanding Society team is looking into it and we will get back to you as soon as we can.</p>
<p>We aim to respond to simple queries within 48 hours and more complex issues within 7 working days. While we will aim to keep to this response times due to the current coronavirus (COVID-19) related situation it may take us longer to respond.</p>
<p>Best wishes,<br />Understanding Society User Support Team</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #1483: The use of weight "indscui_lw" reduces the number of observations. Is it correct?https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1483?journal_id=56552021-01-19T17:48:14ZOlena Kaminskaolena@essex.ac.uk
<ul></ul><p>Thank you for your question. You are using the correct weight if your model includes longitudinal information (i.e. any information form previous waves). If all of the information comes from one wave - use cross-sectional weight xw. <br />The longitudinal weight requires response in each wave since wave 6. If this is not required for your analysis you can create your own tailored weight starting with the issue weight _li at wave 6 and modelling nonresponse between wave 6 and your model. <br />Also, consider two other alternatives: using higher p-value (e.g. 0.1) if your sample size is very small. And consider using one-sided test if your have a prior directional hypothesis.</p>
<p>Hope this helps,<br />Olena</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #1483: The use of weight "indscui_lw" reduces the number of observations. Is it correct?https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1483?journal_id=56602021-01-20T15:57:19ZAlita Nandi
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Feedback</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>10</i> to <i>80</i></li></ul> Understanding Society User Support - Support #1483: The use of weight "indscui_lw" reduces the number of observations. Is it correct?https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1483?journal_id=57202021-01-28T15:56:14ZAlita Nandi
<ul><li><strong>Private</strong> changed from <i>Yes</i> to <i>No</i></li></ul> Understanding Society User Support - Support #1483: The use of weight "indscui_lw" reduces the number of observations. Is it correct?https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1483?journal_id=61752021-08-05T13:05:11ZUnderstanding Society User Support Teamusersupport@understandingsociety.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Assignee</strong> deleted (<del><i>Olena Kaminska</i></del>)</li></ul> Understanding Society User Support - Support #1483: The use of weight "indscui_lw" reduces the number of observations. Is it correct?https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/1483?journal_id=62982021-10-12T13:41:28ZUnderstanding Society User Support Teamusersupport@understandingsociety.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>Feedback</i> to <i>Resolved</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>80</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul>