https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/https://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/support/favicon.ico?15995719382013-01-17T19:07:12ZUnderstanding Society User SupportUnderstanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=2922013-01-17T19:07:12ZSamuel Kaponskapon1@brandeis.edu
<ul></ul><p>I'm sorry, I forgot to include that this is for the Innovation Panel.</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3022013-01-24T16:35:28ZRedmine Adminjpeterb@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Category</strong> set to <i>Data documentation</i></li><li><strong>Assignee</strong> set to <i>Redmine Admin</i></li><li><strong>Target version</strong> set to <i>IP5</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>0</i> to <i>50</i></li></ul><p>Sam,<br />As I understand your question, this is about identifying the child the parent is asked the parental educational expectations about. For co-habiting children you can simply use the _pedchpno (the _pno of the child) when linking to info about the child. For non-resident children it will be easier for you to use _pedchpid (the pidp of the child). The latter is not yet on the data set, but will be included in the deposited version of the data (let me know if required sooner). In you example, person number 3 is likely to refer to a child present at the previous wave. At the interview this now non-resident child is linked to the parents through a list of issued household members from the previous wave. USE states whether it is a direct question (Ask ...) or a computed item. UNIVERSE contains the Boolean logic for who is eligible for the item. I hope the data and questionnaire will make more sense now.<br />Jakob</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3042013-01-24T18:47:46ZSamuel Kaponskapon1@brandeis.edu
<ul></ul><p>Jakob,</p>
<p>Ah I see. So in the example I gave, is the entry in PEDCHPNO of 3 an error? If the child is now not a co-resident, shouldn't he not be reported in PEDCHPNO? I may not be understanding this correctly.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
<p>Best,<br />Sam</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3052013-01-25T15:35:19ZRedmine Adminjpeterb@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>New</i> to <i>In Progress</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>50</i> to <i>80</i></li></ul><p>Sam,<br />Yes or at least not very helpful. For the very small number of non-resident children we will provide the identifier, pedchpid, which is equivalent of pidp. Thanks for making us aware of this issue.<br />Jakob</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3082013-01-28T15:50:26ZSamuel Kaponskapon1@brandeis.edu
<ul></ul><p>Ok thank you very much.</p>
<p>My final question concerns the age and gender variables in the e_person dataset. It seems that in some instances, e_psex (Gender of the respondent) is deemed "Inapplicable", whereas, for example, if the person has e_pno=1, e_idmsex01 (gender of household member 1) does in fact contain the gender (either Male or Female). Is there some reason for this, or can I safely move the values from e_idmage to e_psex without error (I thought it have something to do with fed-forward information, but I'm just not sure)?</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3112013-01-29T13:37:37ZRedmine Adminjpeterb@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>80</i> to <i>90</i></li></ul><p>The demographic variables on HHGRID take precedence over variables found in other files.<br />Jakob</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3132013-01-30T21:31:42ZSamuel Kaponskapon1@brandeis.edu
<ul></ul><p>Ok, so then does this hold true for the relationship variables, e_pr, in the e_person dataset as well (i.e. the HHGRID variables are more accurate)?</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3142013-01-31T08:55:33ZRedmine Adminjpeterb@essex.ac.uk
<ul></ul><p>Yes, variables defined in the <a href="https://www.understandingsociety.ac.uk/documentation/innovation-panel/questionnaires" class="external">questionnaire documentation</a> take precedence over temporary variables.<br />Jakob</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3152013-01-31T12:10:52ZSamuel Kaponskapon1@brandeis.edu
<ul></ul><p>I see, thank you very much!<br />Sam</p> Understanding Society User Support - Support #112: Most Recent Wave Questions - Parental Educational Expectationshttps://iserredex.essex.ac.uk/support/issues/112?journal_id=3172013-01-31T12:21:15ZRedmine Adminjpeterb@essex.ac.uk
<ul><li><strong>Status</strong> changed from <i>In Progress</i> to <i>Closed</i></li><li><strong>% Done</strong> changed from <i>90</i> to <i>100</i></li></ul>